{"id":773,"date":"2015-08-19T16:37:47","date_gmt":"2015-08-19T14:37:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.hakisa.com\/en\/?p=773"},"modified":"2019-07-22T16:11:09","modified_gmt":"2019-07-22T16:11:09","slug":"humanizing-technology-challenge-innovation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hakisa.com\/en\/blog\/humanizing-technology-challenge-innovation\/","title":{"rendered":"Humanizing technology: a challenge for innovation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Albert Einstein<\/strong>\u00a0once wrote:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201c<\/strong>It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity [\u2026] Concern for man himself and his fate must always form the chief interest of all technical endeavors. Never forget this in the midst of your diagrams and equations.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

More than 80 years later, it seems Einstein was as right as he could be. Technological solutions keep on developing straight to our everyday life which makes providers wonder: how can we humanize technology?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"humanizing<\/a><\/p>\n

Humanizing technology: to what end?<\/span><\/h2>\n

These past years are characterized by the birth of amazing technological innovations in various areas: 3D printing, medecine, home automation, robotics, communication\u2026<\/p>\n

We often can\u2019t quite grasp the impact of technology or even fear it<\/strong>. Einstein himself wondered if including too much technology in our lives was harmful. Innovations quickly grow thus provoking a fear of letting technology take over our lives.\u00a0What if technology was more dehumanizing than helpful?<\/p>\n

According to Pol Pla I Conesa, PhD at MIT, technology improves our lives without a doubt but people developing technology often forget the users for they are blinded by the incredible technical possibilities.
\nIf a technological product must be powerful, it mostly needs to be useful to the users.<\/p>\n

Today, the primary purpose of developers and providers is to integrate a human point of view to the innovation<\/strong>. Progress is not going to stop; it is crucial that users understand technologies in order to distinguish\u00a0the useful from the worthless.<\/p>\n

Humanizing technology or creating love\u00a0?<\/span><\/h2>\n

Steve Jobs<\/strong> said: \u201cOne of the things I’ve always found is that you’ve got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. [\u2026]As we have tried to come up with a strategy and a vision for Apple, it started with \u2018What incredible benefits can we give to the customer? Where can we take the customer?’<\/em> \u201d<\/p>\n

\"baymax\"<\/p>\n

Following the ergonomics principles, the user experience<\/a> (UX) should come first in the development process of a new product. Will my product be useful to the user? Is it credible, desirable, findable, and accessible? The product is adapted to the user and not the other way around!<\/p>\n

Such a philosophy led Steve Jobs and Apple to a great success. In 2011, Martin Lindstrom lead a series of fMRI on Apple fans<\/a> in order to study their brain activity while using an Apple product. Contrary to the original assumption, the active areas of the brain are not the ones related to addiction. When the subject slide or tap the screen of an iPhone, the insula is activated. The insula, or insular cortex, is the brain area associated with feelings of compassion, love and pleasure.<\/p>\n

Technology takes such an important part of some people lives that a love relationship is born<\/strong>. In some cases, technology can even provoke the same emotional reaction than a relative, a boyfriend or a girlfriend.<\/p>\n

Following Jobs\u2019 footstep, professionals wonder: how is it possible to create desire and pleasure in the use of technology?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Demystification is needed to humanize technologies<\/span><\/h2>\n

Denis Bertrand,<\/strong> a French semiologist, believes that our minds build a myth around technology in 3 steps:<\/p>\n